Is it ethical for scientists to do research abroad that would be forbidden at home?
Media Release, Tuesday 27 February 2007
Loane Skene, Professor of Law at the University of Melbourne asks is it ethical for scientists to conduct, or benefit from research in another country, if that research would be unlawful, or not generally accepted in their own country?
In a policy paper published in PLoS Medicine, Professor Skene presents a unique ‘barometer’ for gauging the ethics of such research.
There are many reasons for scientists to undertake research abroad, says Professor Skene, including gaining access to more diverse research facilities and participants in research, or acquiring kudos, academic advancement, or commercial benefits from an enhanced international reputation. And they may also be able to undertake activities in another country that would not be permitted in their own country due to legal or ethical constraints.
"In most cases," says Professor Skene, "it will be lawful in their own country to undertake such activities overseas. It is rare for countries to have laws directly preventing their nationals doing research overseas that would not be permitted at home, or even bringing back the products of such research, unless they pose a safety risk, such as importing genetically manipulated organisms created overseas."
But would it be ethical? To address this question, the author has devised an "ethico-legal barometer" (‘Skene's Barometer’; see Figure 1 in link below) that gauges whether it would be ethical to do research abroad that is banned at home. The needle of the barometer moves through five zones—white, green, yellow, orange, and red. Research that falls in the red zone, such as research to develop chemical weapons in violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention, may be regarded as unethical and should be banned, says Professor Skene. "If scientists in the home country seem inclined to do ‘red zone’ research in other countries, the home country can enact extraterritorial laws to prevent them doing so”.
In the policy paper, the author illustrates her arguments by focusing on human embryonic stem cell research, and a project in which a group of international experts - Hinxton Group- agreed on a consensus statement setting out principles for transnational stem cell research.
The paper entitled ‘Undertaking Research in Other Countries: National Ethico-Legal Barometers and International Ethical Consensus Statements’ is published in PLoS Medicine, February 2007, Volume 4, Issue 2 and can be found at this link:
medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0040010
For more information:
Professor Loane Skene
Faculty of Law
University of Melbourne
Tel: +613 8344 4858
For more information about this article:
Dr Nerissa Hannink
Media Officer
University of Melbourne
Tel: +613 8344 8151
Mob: 04305 88055
|
|
